Trump's Approach to Diplomacy: Ambush or Strategy?
A closer look at Trump’s record suggests a more complex reality than the implications of a label such as "ambush diplomacy".


In practical terms, it is difficult to argue that Trump follows a strategy of “ambush diplomacy.” Such a claim would require internal documents, which may not become available for years, proving that the US president first devised a secret plan to launch military strikes and then engaged in negotiations to deceive his opponents and persuade them to lower their guard.
What the events have shown so far is that Trump’s wars have generally resulted from an accumulation of factors, ranging from personal considerations to objective circumstances, rather than from carefully designed and premeditated plans.
The mere fact that military operations followed negotiations is not, by itself, sufficient evidence to support the theory of “ambush diplomacy.”