Ceasefire under strain as Lebanon’s military delegation heads to Washington

Lebanon 28-05-2026 | 14:56

Ceasefire under strain as Lebanon’s military delegation heads to Washington

With Israeli escalation intensifying on the ground, discussions in Washington focus on enforcing the ceasefire, strengthening the Lebanese Army’s capabilities south of the Litani, and whether deteriorating conditions could delay upcoming Lebanon Israel negotiations.

Ceasefire under strain as Lebanon’s military delegation heads to Washington
From previous meetings in Washington between the Lebanese and Israeli ambassadors.
Smaller Bigger

 

The Lebanese military delegation arrived in Washington to take part in Pentagon meetings scheduled for May 29 of this month, at a highly sensitive moment both on the ground and politically, as Israeli strikes expand across southern Lebanon and the western Bekaa, and talk resumes about the possibility of postponing the next round of direct negotiations between Lebanon and Israel if the escalation continues at the same pace.

 

According to available information, Washington is primarily focusing on consolidating the ceasefire. Its main demand remains the halt of Hezbollah’s military operations, particularly drone activity, and obtaining clear guarantees that escalation from the Lebanese side will not resume.

 

This message has been conveyed more than once through political and security channels to Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri, who is effectively managing a large part of the communications linked to the negotiations.

 

However, the question being raised in Beirut is what the Lebanese delegation is bringing to Washington under this pressure. Does Lebanon actually possess real negotiating cards, or is the mission limited to containing pressure and attempting to prevent a complete collapse of the ceasefire process?

 

 

 

LAF presents what it has achieved south of the Litani

 

 

According to the information, the Lebanese military delegation will present to US officials a summary of what the Lebanese Army has accomplished since its deployment in the south of the Litani area following the first ceasefire agreement on November 27, 2024, in an attempt to respond to Israeli and American accusations that the Lebanese military deployment has been insufficient or ineffective.


The delegation will provide a detailed briefing on the measures taken by the army, both in terms of deployment and in clearing mines and removing ammunition and explosives. It will also outline the field challenges it has faced, particularly the lack of accurate information about tunnels and military infrastructure in some areas, as well as the significant shortage of military and logistical equipment.

 

It will also note that 12 soldiers were killed during demining, engineering surveys, and the removal of war remnants, sending a clear message that the military institution has paid a direct price while carrying out its missions to stabilize the situation in the south.

 

Promises of support… without implementation

 

Among the key points the delegation will also raise is the issue of military support. According to informed sources, the Lebanese side will emphasize that the army has received numerous promises of aid and advanced equipment that would help it carry out its missions south of the Litani, but most of these promises have not yet been translated into practice. This has negatively affected its operational capacity.

 

Lebanon will request additional support for the next phase, especially if developments move toward a long-term consolidation of the ceasefire or toward new security arrangements in the south. This comes at a time of growing concern within military institutions about the post 2027 phase, when the mandate of UNIFIL is set to expire unless it is renewed or its mission is modified.

 

In this context, the Lebanese delegation will also discuss the mechanism of cooperation with the “Mechanism” committee overseeing the implementation of the security understandings, as well as the future of coordination with international forces and their role in any subsequent arrangements.

 

 

No discussion of Hezbollah weapons yet

 

Despite all American and Israeli pressure, current indications suggest that the issue of exclusive control over weapons or the disarmament of Hezbollah is not directly on the agenda of the ongoing military meetings, as US priorities are currently focused on consolidating the ceasefire and preventing the expansion of confrontation, rather than entering into complex internal political files that are widely understood to exceed the capacity of any technical military negotiations.

 

However, this does not negate the fact that Washington is treating what is happening as a foundational phase for a broader process that could be opened later if the current de-escalation arrangements succeed.

 

 

Previous negotiations between Lebanon and Israel (archive image).
Previous negotiations between Lebanon and Israel (archive image).

 

 

Will the next round be postponed?

 

In contrast, the fate of the next round of negotiations remains directly tied to developments on the ground. The ongoing Israeli escalation and the expansion of strikes to major cities and urban centers are increasing tensions and placing any negotiating process under real scrutiny.

 

Diplomatic sources fear that the continuation of military operations could lead to postponement of the expected round, or at least to its convening in an extremely complicated atmosphere.

 

This is particularly the case as Israel is attempting to raise the level of military and political pressure ahead of any negotiations, while Lebanon is seeking to establish a framework based on a ceasefire first, before moving on to any broader security or political discussions.